Skip to main content
Cost & Business

Comparing Downtime Costs: Utility Strikes vs. Hydrovacing

2 min read214 words

Overview

The article examines how utility strikes during traditional excavation create significant project delays and costs, while hydro excavation offers a safer, more cost-effective alternative.

The True Cost of Utility Strikes

According to the Common Ground Alliance, "the direct and indirect costs of utility damages in the U.S. exceed $30 billion annually."

Breakdown of utility strike expenses:

  • Direct costs: Repair bills, emergency response, equipment damage
  • Indirect costs: Project delays, lost productivity, idle crew time
  • Liability costs: Insurance claims, lawsuits, regulatory fines
  • Reputation loss: Negative publicity and reduced client trust

A single utility strike typically costs contractors between $4,000 and $25,000.

Hydrovacing as Risk Mitigation

Hydro excavation provides:

  • Precision digging around utilities
  • Non-destructive methods using pressurized water
  • Fewer project delays
  • Reduced insurance claims

Cost Comparison Table

FactorUtility StrikesHydrovac
Direct cost per incident$4,000–$25,000$0–$500
Project delay1–3 days (potentially weeks)Minimal, typically hours
Insurance impactPremium increasesPremium savings over time
Safety riskHighLow

Additional Benefits of Avoiding Downtime

  • Reduced overtime labor costs
  • Improved client satisfaction
  • Fewer late delivery penalties
  • More efficient equipment utilization

Share this article

Featured In
Fort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan RecordFort Worth Business PressThe Business PressSt. Louis Post-DispatchRimbey ReviewFort Saskatchewan Record